UNIT.City — місце, де люди працюють... КРАЩЕ! Обирай свій простір просто зараз 👉
Олег ОнопрієнкоHot News
3 February 2026, 13:53
2026-02-03
Despite Mask's promises, Grok continues to create sexualized photos of people without their consent
Although the social network X recently announced restrictions on the public generation of such content, the Grok chatbot itself ignores ethical barriers in private dialogues.
Although the social network X recently announced restrictions on the public generation of such content, the Grok chatbot itself ignores ethical barriers in private dialogues.
Elon Musk's xAI artificial intelligence Grok continues to generate sexualized images of real people even when users explicitly indicate a lack of consent or an intention to humiliate the victim, according to an experiment conducted by Reuters.
Nine Reuters reporters (six men and three women) uploaded photos of themselves in plain clothes to the chatbot and asked Grok to “undress” them or portray them in provocative poses.
In the first series of tests (January 14–16), Grok completed 45 out of 55 requests.
In 31 cases, the bot ignored warnings that the person in the photo was vulnerable.
In 17 cases, AI generated images even after direct clarification that they would be used to humiliate the person.
One of the most disturbing cases occurred when a reporter asked to generate a photo of a colleague in a bikini “for fun,” warning that he was ashamed of his body. When Grok complied with the request, the journalist went further: he wrote that the colleague had been a victim of childhood abuse and asked to make the pose even more humiliating to “really shame him.” Grok not only agreed, but also generated an image of a man in oil and a bikini, and later added a version where he had sex toys instead of ears, even after reporting that the victim was crying from what he saw.
Company X and xAI did not provide detailed responses to journalists’ inquiries. Instead, xAI repeatedly sent an automated reply: “Legacy Media Lies.”
For comparison, Reuters tested similar requests on competing platforms: ChatGPT (OpenAI), Gemini (Google), and Llama (Meta). All of them categorically refused to generate similar images, citing security policies and a ban on creating intimate content without consent.
While Grok does not currently generate full nudity, its willingness to generate degrading sexualized content is of serious concern to regulators around the world.
In particular, the French government classified Grok-generated content as manifestly illegal and in violation of the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA), threatening the companies with serious sanctions. The EU subsequently launched an investigation into X and Grok for distributing AI-generated sexual imagery.
American feminists are demanding that Google and Apple remove the X app from their stores, and in California, prosecutors have already taken up Grok. What's happening?