UNIT.City — місце, де люди працюють... КРАЩЕ! Обирай свій простір просто зараз 👉
Марія БровінськаWar
14 July 2025, 08:11
2025-07-14
The programmer filed documents for an extension of the suspension and learned that he was wanted. Aityvets decided to appeal the fine of 17,000 UAH imposed on him in court: what happened?
The Kyiv District Court of Kharkiv considered the case of bringing to administrative responsibility a programmer of LLC «Kharkiv Pharmaceutical Enterprise „People’s Health“», who wanted to extend the postponement of mobilization and found out that he was a violator of mobilization legislation and received a fine of 17,000 UAH. Now the IT worker is appealing the fine in court. We tell you the details of the court’s decision.
The Kyiv District Court of Kharkiv considered the case of bringing to administrative responsibility a programmer of LLC «Kharkiv Pharmaceutical Enterprise „People’s Health“», who wanted to extend the postponement of mobilization and found out that he was a violator of mobilization legislation and received a fine of 17,000 UAH. Now the IT worker is appealing the fine in court. We tell you the details of the court’s decision.
According to the case materials, in 2020, the IT soldier was deregistered from one TCC and transferred to another, as indicated by the relevant notes in his military ID card. However, for unknown reasons, he remained assigned to the previous TCC at the Oberig base, which he was not aware of.
The plaintiff notes that he has the right to a deferral because he is the adoptive parent of a child deprived of parental care. In order to exercise his right to a deferral, in January 2025 he applied to the CCC, where he received a certificate of deferral from military service during mobilization for a special period of leave. However, when he re-submitted documents for an extension of the deferral, the integration center reported that the man had been declared a violator and was wanted.
After contacting the CCC, he was informed that he had violated the legislation on military service. Allegedly, the IT worker ignored the fact that since 2020 he has been registered with one CCC, received a deferral from them, and his employer regularly transfers data on all conscripts working at the enterprise.
The IT worker also notes that during the drafting of the resolution, which awarded the IT worker a fine of 17,000 UAH for violating military registration (the man allegedly did not update the data), the procedure and a number of procedural rights were violated, and the court resolution he is appealing against does not contain any evidence of attempts to obtain relevant information about him.
The court, having examined the circumstances of the case, overturned the decision to impose a fine and closed the case regarding the programmer’s violation of mobilization legislation.
And the CCC, which imposed the fine, must compensate the man for the court fee he paid.
An appeal against a court decision may be filed within ten days from the date of its pronouncement to the Second Administrative Court of Appeal.
