In the first days in the unit, all the newly mobilized men had a personal conversation with the unit’s psychologist. Almost all the men were skeptical about this, to put it mildly:
«What does this brainwasher want? I won’t tell him anything.»
— Shit, can we do without this?
— Fuck him, he’ll still be putting his psychological tests on me.
I was interested, because I generally take psychology as a science quite seriously and with respect.
I go into his house. A small, short man is sitting there, smiling. We shook hands, introduced ourselves. He started with questions about my education and work — to warm up. I talked for a long time about what I know and can do. I wanted to «sell» myself as a manager and IT specialist. I listened, took notes. Then he asked a question I didn’t expect:
— What would you do if someone in your management did something illegal? I answer, «I would think first, assess the situation.»
He:
— What if it’s someone from the lowest rank? I say it’s the same thing, you need to think, figure it out, situations are different, you need more specifics.
He twisted his mind, and somehow skillfully brought to light WHAT I had been doing for these four years, and concluded that I had also been living illegally for these years. I think he probably wanted to see if I would make excuses. I didn’t want to do that.
I say yes, I ignored it, I admit it.
He:
— Yes, you ignored reality.
But he said it without arrogance and without any desire to poke fun. At least I didn’t feel it.
He said that he had also gone through something similar. He was mobilized, taken from work, but eventually he took a position in the army that was close to him. As far as I remember, he was a senior lieutenant.
Then he continued:
— This is an attempt to escape from reality. You were engaged in work, management, you say, you had forecasting there, but you missed your real, most important forecasting — with the war. You didn’t think about it in advance, you didn’t foresee it.
I answer him absolutely sincerely that it is so, I did not deal with this issue, which is why I found myself in such circumstances.
Then there were questions and answers on various topics, and somewhere I said that I was thinking all this time about myself, but not about my loved ones, not about how they might feel if I was mobilized.
And he says: «No, you didn’t think about yourself or your loved ones.»
I say that I was thinking about other areas of myself, about the future, preparing myself for life after the war.
And he said: «Yes, but you missed the present, life during the war.»
He also asked about friends: what is friendship, how do I make friends, what is fraternity? I say that I have no experience with fraternities, I can’t say.
He: «You’re very selective,» or some such word, that I’m picky about who I choose my close people.
At first I didn’t understand what it was about. I said no, it was all spontaneous, I had different friends based on social status and character, I got close to some very quickly, and to others more slowly.
Then he asks how I support myself.
— I have certain meanings and values.
He says: «I’m sure of this, but how do you help yourself?»
— Well, when I’m very excited, I breathe deeply (the parasympathetic nervous system is activated, all that).
Then he asked if there was anyone who supported me. I said yes, my beloved, we have been together since we were 18.
And he said: «Well, you say it’s not selective.»
I think, in general, yes, it’s hard for me to let new people in, and almost all of my friends and relatives are now either from school or university.
We talked for about 15 minutes, while with other men the conversations didn’t last longer than 5-7 minutes. We ended abruptly, without any logical ending. He just said that everything would be fine.
At the end of our meeting, the psychologist reached out to hug me (I didn’t mind, I even got emotional at some point during the conversation, because he was the first person outside my circle of friends with whom I could talk about everything that had happened, from a psychological perspective, and at approximately the same level of communication and understanding.
And he also said that it was very nice and unusual that there were still people like me. I still don’t understand what he meant.
After some time, I learned that he had recommended me and another guy my age (as everyone like us was called there — «AIT guy») to the leadership for staff positions. Only from one man (50 years old, very pleasant to me) I heard about his relatively positive experience after this «session». He said: «This psychologist is interesting. He could be an investigator: he wraps up the question like that — he will get everything.»