UNIT.City — місце, де люди працюють... КРАЩЕ! Обирай свій простір просто зараз 👉
Стас ЮрасовThat's Life
14 May 2026, 16:31
2026-05-14
Podolsk court canceled UAH 25,500 fine from CCC: Kyiv resident learned about punishment through notification in monobank
The Podilskyi District Court of Kyiv has overturned the CCC’s decision to hold a man administratively liable for violating mobilization rules. As it became known from the case materials, the story began in June 2025, when the plaintiff unexpectedly received a notification in the monobank mobile application about the opening of enforcement proceedings against him for the amount of more than 56,000 UAH.
The Podilskyi District Court of Kyiv has overturned the CCC’s decision to hold a man administratively liable for violating mobilization rules. As it became known from the case materials, the story began in June 2025, when the plaintiff unexpectedly received a notification in the monobank mobile application about the opening of enforcement proceedings against him for the amount of more than 56,000 UAH.
After involving a lawyer, it turned out that back in November 2024, the head of the district CCC issued a resolution imposing a fine of UAH 25,500 under Part 3 of Article 210-1 of the Code of Administrative Offenses. The military commissariats claimed that the man ignored calls to clarify his credentials. However, the plaintiff himself stated in court that he had not received any summonses, and no one had informed him about the consideration of the case against him and the imposition of a fine.
Representatives of the CCC, in their response to the lawsuit, insisted on the legality of their actions, referring to the tracking data of Ukrposhta about the sending of the summons. However, Judge S. S. Zakharchuk, having examined the materials, found a significant procedural flaw on the part of the CCC. Although the defendant provided evidence of sending the summons to «clarify the data», he did not provide any evidence that the conscript was properly informed about the date, time and place of the meeting itself, at which the resolution on the fine was passed.
The court recalled that the right of a person to know about the consideration of his case is a basic constitutional guarantee. Since the CCC considered the case «in absentia», without making sure that the man had been notified of the administrative proceedings, this deprived the latter of his right to defense, explanation and legal assistance. The Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized that violation of the consideration procedure is an independent ground for canceling the fine.
As a result, the court fully satisfied the claim: the penalty order was canceled, and the administrative case was closed. In addition, the CCC is now obliged to reimburse the plaintiff for the costs of paying the court fee. The court’s decision can still be appealed within ten days.
