The plaintiff requested that the CCC’s actions regarding the entry of data on failure to appear for a summons into the Unified State Register of conscripts, military conscripts, and reservists be declared unlawful, and that this information be removed. Earlier, the Khmelnytskyi District Administrative Court refused to satisfy the claim.
The plaintiff requested that the CCC’s actions regarding the entry of data on failure to appear for a summons into the Unified State Register of conscripts, military conscripts, and reservists be declared unlawful, and that this information be removed. Earlier, the Khmelnytskyi District Administrative Court refused to satisfy the claim.
The plaintiff works as a software engineer at KhNPP and, according to him, is subject to booking as an employee of a critical enterprise. In July 2025, he received two summonses demanding to appear at the CCC to clarify his credentials.
The day before the specified date, the man notified the CCC about his illness and sent a statement with medical documents. At the same time, the «Reserve+» application displayed the mark «Wanted by CCC and SP: violation of military registration». Because of this, the company was unable to book him through the «Diya» portal — the system returned the status «Not booked» with the reason «Person is wanted».
In addition, the CCC sent an appeal to the National Police to deliver the conscript for drawing up a report under Article 210-1 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (violation of the legislation on defense and mobilization). The report had not been drawn up at the time of consideration of the case.
The appellate court agreed with the conclusions of the first instance:
the obligation to appear upon summons is established by law and does not depend on the right to reservation;
the validity of the reasons for non-appearance is determined during the consideration of the administrative offense case;
Placing a mark in «Reserve+» does not in itself mean holding someone accountable, but indicates the automatic generation of an appeal to the police to take the person to the CCC for the purpose of drawing up a report.
The court concluded that the CCC acted «on the basis, within the limits and in the manner» specified by law, and the arguments of the appeal do not refute the fact of failure to appear for the summons.
On February 11, 2026, the Seventh Administrative Court of Appeal (Vinnytsia) upheld the first instance decision in the case of a military-enlisted employee of the Khmelnytskyi NPP branch of NNEGC Energoatom, who appealed the entry in the register of information about violations of military registration rules.
The appeal was dismissed, the decision of the first instance was unchanged. The resolution entered into force on the date of its adoption and is not subject to appeal.
