Mazda CX5
Як зробити цифрову копію себе. Ось відео —>

“Military companies today are like Ukrainian IT companies 15 years ago.” 7 questions for the CEO of Frontline Robotics — about the future of war, FPV, the shortage of engineers and more

Ukrainian defense tech has already become a separate industry with its own rules, competition, and personnel challenges. Companies are no longer arguing about whether drones are needed — now they are looking for answers to other questions: how to protect themselves from FPV drones, which engineers are most in short supply, why robotics is becoming the next stage of war, and how to convince IT professionals to move into the defense industry.

In the new dev.ua series, we ask the same questions to the heads of Ukrainian defense tech companies to show what Ukrainian miltech is doing today, what challenges it is experiencing, and where the industry is heading.

The hero of this issue is CEO and co-founder of Frontline Robotics Yevhen Tretyak, who told why the main limitation of the development of the defense industry is not money, but people, what technologies are overvalued today, why the fight against FPV drones will become one of the key areas of the coming years, and why, in his opinion, modern defense tech is very reminiscent of Ukrainian IT from fifteen years ago.

3 comments
“Military companies today are like Ukrainian IT companies 15 years ago.” 7 questions for the CEO of Frontline Robotics — about the future of war, FPV, the shortage of engineers and more

Ukrainian defense tech has already become a separate industry with its own rules, competition, and personnel challenges. Companies are no longer arguing about whether drones are needed — now they are looking for answers to other questions: how to protect themselves from FPV drones, which engineers are most in short supply, why robotics is becoming the next stage of war, and how to convince IT professionals to move into the defense industry.

In the new dev.ua series, we ask the same questions to the heads of Ukrainian defense tech companies to show what Ukrainian miltech is doing today, what challenges it is experiencing, and where the industry is heading.

The hero of this issue is CEO and co-founder of Frontline Robotics Yevhen Tretyak, who told why the main limitation of the development of the defense industry is not money, but people, what technologies are overvalued today, why the fight against FPV drones will become one of the key areas of the coming years, and why, in his opinion, modern defense tech is very reminiscent of Ukrainian IT from fifteen years ago.

— What, in your opinion, is the biggest problem facing Ukrainian defense tech right now and what pain is bothering your business the most right now?

One of the biggest problems now is finding good specialists for the team. It has arisen because the industry is growing very rapidly, and a large number of specialists who would like to join the defense tech industry have already joined it. Accordingly, there is a certain personnel shortage.

Finding good specialists for both the administrative part and developers is quite difficult and limited. I would put this in the first place as the biggest problem for the development and scaling of the business and the company’s ability to manufacture and create the number of robotic systems that the Ukrainian Defense Forces need.

— In your opinion, which technology is the most overrated today, and which, on the contrary, is underestimated?

I can definitely say that at some point in time the direction of the guidance technology for FPV drones for ground targets was greatly overestimated. A lot has been said about it, many companies have actually done it coolly and qualitatively. But so far, as I understand it, it has not been widely implemented. However, this technology has found good application in the fight against air targets. Perhaps the time will come for ground targets as well.

Regarding underrated technologies. Of course, this is air defense. Everything is clear here. It is needed both in cities and on the battlefield. Now developers have begun to actively work on it.

Another such technology is the fight against drones, both FPV and small bombers, as well as Lancets, Lightnings, etc.

Drones are the primary means of destruction on both sides today, so effective countermeasures are critically needed. Currently, they are slowly emerging, but certainly not as quickly as we would like.

At the same time, semi-autonomous drones are emerging that will behave less predictably. So this fight will continue continuously and for a long time.

The importance of fighting FPV drones on the battlefield needs to be talked about more at all levels. In my opinion, it is currently under-communicated. Fortunately, there are teams that are working on solutions, and it is working great, but there are still not enough of these companies. But I think that on the battlefield, the most important thing is fighting FPV drones.

— What do you think war will be like in 2-3 years from a technological point of view?

Well, in my opinion, no drastic changes are expected yet. For any drastic changes to occur, something critically new would have to be invented.

Therefore, first of all, I would talk about the robotization of the army. Let’s start with the sky, where, I am sure, semi-autonomous and autonomous solutions will appear. When such means receive their countermeasures, we will move on to the total robotization of the ground domain. Actually, we in the company are actively moving in this direction of a robotic line of defense, where the most dangerous areas will be closed by robots, and people will make decisions.

Who is the hardest person to hire and why? And how do you solve this issue?

Probably the most difficult thing is to hire engineers, everything related to Embedded of various types. This word encompasses many directions. Why are they so important? Because any manufacturing company, if it creates something innovative, needs R&D. To make robots cheaper, more efficient, more autonomous and more friendly to the end user, R&D is needed. We need creative people who create something necessary and extraordinary.

Every manufacturing company starts with R&D. They create something valuable in the beginning, and then the company scales it up. R&D is our heart, our initial impulse.

Accordingly, the demand for such people is high, because many companies are engaged in development, and there is great competition for such specialists.

What do we do to find such specialists? First, we create a product necessary for the front. Second, we give interesting, deeply technological tasks. Our products are complex and innovative, as well as high-quality. This is interesting to people.

And thirdly, we understand that not all talents are concentrated in Kyiv. That is why, for example, we are launching a project to relocate specialists. For our part, we are simplifying and covering all the needs and expenses for specialists and their families for moving, so that they have the opportunity to simply start working and create robots with us.

What does civilian IT misunderstand about defense tech?

In my personal opinion, people don’t fully understand the industry as a whole. Part of this is due to military companies not communicating this properly. People don’t really know how R&D in defense is different from R&D in an IT outsourcing company.

First, the dynamics are different in defense. Here, developers are not teams of 100 people, where everyone sits and writes some small part. This is usually teamwork, where you are deeply involved in what you are doing, much deeper than in outsourcing. The reason for this is a small team. The leaders of these teams are 100% people who are very worried about the product and the result. For them, it is not just a project, it is part of life. They breathe and live it.

Therefore, the entire team is very involved, it is impossible to just come and not immerse yourself in the process 100%. And it is not only about development and technicality, but also about emotions. Constant trips to testing and testing grounds, demo days.

The military comes and explains the importance of what you do. This creates an understanding that your work is literally vital. It’s a whole different level of responsibility.

On the one hand, your goal is to help the military, and on the other, you understand what the consequences of any shortcomings will be. At the same time, the question of expediency never arises.

What would you like to say to IT professionals who are hesitating whether or not to go defensive?

Over the past five years, defense has essentially become a military IT industry. I’m to the point where the defense industry is radically no different from regular IT. This is the first thing to understand. These are the same medium or large companies, just military-oriented. There are exclusively software companies that deal with software, but much, of course, is related to hardware.

These are the same offices, meetings, sprints, coffee. Everything very much repeats what happens in classic IT companies, because a huge part of military companies are built by people who previously worked in large IT companies. Therefore, this whole culture has migrated and continues to migrate. The developer has already gotten used to a certain format of work, and this format has been preserved.

Second, military companies in Ukraine are now like the classic IT industry of about 15 years ago. There will be a huge boom in this development, companies will become larger, enter foreign markets. There will be significantly higher wages, because companies will have such an opportunity. The industry is developing rapidly, you can come here and have a real impact. If people ever wanted to become leaders, create or try their own product, this is the place.

Military companies are ready for experiments, ready for internal startups. If you have an idea or a desire to get involved, decisions are made quite quickly here: Anyone with such a request for drive and change is welcome.

Of course, there is a part of the work related to everyday life: you have to refine everything, refine it, systematize it, administer it, but all this ultimately leads to a cool product part. There is work for absolutely everyone in the military.

“The one who turns data into decisions and decisions into action faster will win.” 7 questions to the CPO and CEO of SKIFTECH about the overestimated AI talent shortage and the war of the future
«The one who turns data into decisions and decisions into action faster will win.» 7 questions to the CPO and CEO of SKIFTECH about overrated AI, staffing shortages, and the war of the future
On the topic
«The one who turns data into decisions and decisions into action faster will win.» 7 questions to the CPO and CEO of SKIFTECH about overrated AI, staffing shortages, and the war of the future
“The biggest problem and the biggest opportunity for the deftech industry is the existence of Russia.” 7 questions for the CEO of HIMERA about technology, the AI ​​workforce shortage, and future war
«The biggest problem, as well as the biggest opportunity, of the deftech industry is the existence of Russia.» 7 questions for the CEO of HIMERA about technology, the talent shortage, AI and the future of war
On the topic
«The biggest problem, as well as the biggest opportunity, of the deftech industry is the existence of Russia.» 7 questions for the CEO of HIMERA about technology, the talent shortage, AI and the future of war
"We once believed in drones. Now we have to believe in missiles." BlueBird Tech co-founder on the new stage of Ukrainian miltech, dependence on China and the shortage of engineers - 7 questions for the CEO
«We once believed in drones. Now we have to believe in missiles.» BlueBird Tech co-founder on the new stage of Ukrainian miltech, dependence on China and the shortage of engineers — 7 questions for the CEO
On the topic
«We once believed in drones. Now we have to believe in missiles.» BlueBird Tech co-founder on the new stage of Ukrainian miltech, dependence on China and the shortage of engineers — 7 questions for the CEO
“The hardest thing is to find an engineer who can translate a problem into a technical solution.” 7 questions for the CEO of XTI Engineering, which creates demining equipment
«The hardest thing is finding an engineer who can translate a problem into a technical solution.» 7 questions for the CEO of XTI Engineering, which creates demining equipment
On the topic
«The hardest thing is finding an engineer who can translate a problem into a technical solution.» 7 questions for the CEO of XTI Engineering, which creates demining equipment
Read the country's main IT news in our Telegram
Read the country’s main IT news in our Telegram
On the topic
Read the country’s main IT news in our Telegram

Have important news to share? Message our Telegram bot

Key events and useful links in our Telegram channel

Discussion
0

Підкажіть, а який сенс статей про дефіцит інженерів, якщо дії прям ЗОВСІМ інші?
Всі ж в курсі, що далеко не всі можуть працювати у відомих мілтек-компаніях з деяких причин? І компанії про це знають.

Ок, але в результаті цих інженерів, як ви кажете, дефіцитних, залюбки хапають на першому ж блокпості. Бо реальних механізмів в них працювати і щось розробляти/тестувати немає. Не дивлячись на те, скільки грошей та часу вони в це вкладають. У нас досі немає механізму отримання критичності для таких команд. Він є для 40ка річних "студентів", але немає для, як ви кажете, дуже потрібних інженерів, при тому, що останніх в десятки разів менше ніж псевдостудентів.
Так, колись він був як костиль через Дія.Сіті, але його знищили постійними змінами через набіги туди фейкових компаній, але реальним інженерам нічого не запропонували натомість.

Інакше всі ці розмови виглядають як ситуація зі скандалом з МО. Хтось сів на потоки і тягне ковдру на себе, не думаючи про ефективність системи, а лише про свою кишеню, не про іновації та конкуренцію, яка їх породжує, а про те, щоб більше продати свого, потрібного чи ні вже не важливо.

Я це якраз кажу з досвіду як людина зі повним стеком Embedded/Electronics/PCB. Гарні лозунги та реальність дуже відрізняється.

Марія Молодковець
Confirmed verification
Марія Молодковець Frontline Robotics, Communications manager
0

Вітаємо.
Ваш стек виглядає дуже цікавим для нашої компанії, саме зараз активно шукаємо фахівців, тому радо поспілкуємося. Ми бронюємо працівників і маємо багато потенційно релевантних вакансій.

https://www.frontline-robotics.tech/career

0

Маріє, вибачте, але не все так просто. Будь ласка, перечитайте коментар, там усе є.

І тут не про пошук роботи в мілтек-компанії. А тут саме відповідь, як і де взяти цих додаткових інженерів, які будуть задіяні над розробками. Є пласт людей, хоч ї дуже мало, які не можуть і не будуть працювати на відомі компанії, просто забудьте про них як співробітників, ваші спеціалісти із персоналу повинні це знати. Тим не менш вони спроможні інвестувати свій час та кошти в потрібні розробки НЕ під гучним імʼям.
Але, розумієте, виглядає сама система дуже дивно. Тиким людям просто відрізали шлях, бо працювати з залізом без критичності нереально. І є дуже неприємні 2 випадки, про які я знаю, де людей вже потім витягали і повертали до діяльності з купою нервів і часу. І цього б не було, якби був механізм.

Тому подібні статті виглядають як маніпуляція. Не вистачає інженерів - ок, ось вони, чому держава не дає працювати їм, а створює паралельно критичні мутні категорії незрозумілих за функціоналом людей (230 тисяч "студентів" 25+ рочків, до війни було в 10 разів менше, це ж абсурд, це просто схема для тих, хто нічого не робить). Альтернатива - ось ідіть в відому мілтек-компанію, повторююсь - це неможливо. А іншого варіанту гарантовано працювати, а не грати в лотерею - немає. В результаті і ви не отримуєте інженера, а і держава не отримує людину, яка в межах стартапу займається розробкою для армії. І військо їх в результаті не отримає, повірте.

Мутних рішал чути, а малу групу начебто потрібних людей - ні.